Skip tae content

Tower o London test

Copy the goal pattern in as few moves as ye can: plan ahead, then move. Aboot 5 minutes, free, nae sign-up.

Bi the Helibrain teamChecked bi Robert(Inglis), PhD candidate in biophysicsPit oot Last checked

Whit this gemme measures

The Tower o London is a weel-kent plannin puzzle fae psychology research. Ye move coloured ba's atween three pegs o different heights tae copy a goal pattern in as few moves as ye can. It shaws hou weel ye think a few steps ahead afore ye act [1].

The neuropsychologist Tim Shallice designed the task in 1982 tae study plannin [1]. Ilka problem has a smawest nummer o moves, an the task records gin ye reach the goal in that nummer, hou mony extra moves ye need, an hou lang ye think afore yer first move. It looks a wee bit like the Tower o Hanoi, but the rules an problems are different.

The nummer o moves isnae the ae thing that maks a problem hard. Problems whaur the goal leaves the order o the moves open, or whaur ye first hae tae move a ba oot the gate, tak fowk langer tae plan, even wi the same nummer o moves [2][3][4].

Hou the gemme works

  • Three pegs haud 3, 2 an 1 ba's. Move ae ba at a time: anely a ba on tap can move, an niver ontae a fu peg.
  • Ilka problem shawes the goal an the fewest moves it can be dune in. Copy the goal in that mony moves for a perfect solve.
  • 16 problems, fae 2 tae 6 moves, gettin harder. Ilk ane ends efter 60 seconds or 20 moves.
  • Tap a ba, then tap the peg tae pit it on, or drag it. On a keyboard, the keys 1, 2 an 3 lift an pit doon.
  • A short practice problem comes first (ye can skip it). Ilka run paints the ba's in new colours, sae a second try looks new but is jist as hard.

We made oor ain set o problems. A computer search throu aa 36 positions o the ba's checked that the fewest moves for ilka problem is exact, an fae 3 moves up ilka problem has juist ae shortest solution. The goals mix the three shapes researchers vary: aa ba's on ae peg, twa an yin, an yin on ilka peg [2].

Hou tae read yer score

  • Solved in the fewest moves: yer main score, the nummer o perfect solves.
  • Extra moves: moves abuin the fewest, on the problems ye solved.
  • Thinkin afore the first move: hou lang ye leuked afore touchin a ba. Researchers cry this initial plannin time.
  • Hou ye solved: the share o yer time spent afore the first move on the langer problems. A bigger share means ye planned mair o the solution in yer heid first.

In ae study o 179 adults, fowk that spent a bigger share o their time plannin afore the first move tended tae solve mair problems in the fewest moves [5]. Tellin fowk tae plan first helped in ae study [6] but no in anither, whaur fowk planned langer athoot movin ony better [7]. Sae tak “hou ye solved” as a description o this run, no as a rule.

Yince eneuch fowk hae played, yer result shaws an aw whaur ye staun amang ither players o this gemme, as a band: ablo typical, typical or abuin typical. A band, no an exact rank, acause ae run o this task says anely roughly hou ye plan (see ablo). The ither players are veesitors tae this site, no a representative sample.

Whit's a normal score?

Thare are nae norms for this version. In a research version wi 24 harder problems (4 tae 6 moves), young adults solved aboot 17 oot o 24 on average in the fewest moves, an adults aged 61 tae 77 aboot 13 [8]. Oor problems, time limits an screens are different, sae thir nummers gie context, no a measure tae judge yersel by.

Whit this gemme can an cannae tell ye

The Tower o London is uised in research on plannin an in clinical assessment, but this page is a gemme, no a clinical test. It disnae measure intelligence, an ae run is a snapshot: bein tired an the device ye uise change hou ye dae.

In a study o 79 young adults that did a computer Tower o London twice, twa weeks apart, their move scores on the twa days agreed but weakly (a correlation o 0.15), while they got faster at solvin [9]. Sae tak ae result as a rough guide, an leuk at several tries on different days insteid o ae nummer.

Aften speired questions

Whit does the Tower o London test measure?

It measures plannin: workin oot a sequence o moves in yer heid afore ye mak them. The main score is hou mony problems ye solve in the fewest moves. Researchers leuk an aw at hou lang fowk think afore the first move an hou mony extra moves they mak [1][5].

Is the Tower o London the same as the Tower o Hanoi?

Naw. Baith move pieces atween three pegs, but in the Tower o Hanoi ye move a stack o discs o different sizes an maunnae ever pit a bigger disc on a smawer ane. In the Tower o London the ba's are aa the same size, the pegs haud different nummers o ba's, an ilka problem has its ain goal pattern.

Is it better tae plan first or try moves?

Amang fowk, they that spend a bigger share o their time plannin afore the first move tend tae mak fewer extra moves [5]. But bein telt tae plan langer disnae aye help [7]. Try baith ways an see whit works for ye.

Is the Helibrain Tower o London test free?

Aye. The gemme an yer hale result are free: nae sign-up, nae email, nae peyment. Helibrain maks siller fae its app, that ye dinnae need for this gemme.

See aw 43 free brain tests

Want tae wark on this ilka day? The Helibrain app (in Inglis for noo) has a free plan an paid plans.

Cite this page: Tower o London test. Helibrain. 2026. https://helibrain.com/sco/tower-of-london-test. CC BY 4.0.

How this test works

This puzzle measures planning: thinking a few moves ahead before you act. Three pegs hold 3, 2 and 1 balls. Move one ball at a time to copy the goal picture in as few moves as possible. There are 16 problems that need 2 to 6 moves, and each one shows its fewest moves. Your main score is how many problems you solve in exactly the fewest moves. The neuropsychologist Tim Shallice designed this puzzle in 1982.

Version 1 · Cite this test:

Helibrain (2026). Tower of London test, v1. https://helibrain.com/tower-of-london-test/methods

Full method →

Sources

  1. Shallice T (1982). Specific impairments of planning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 298(1089):199–209. doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1982.0082
  2. Kaller CP, Rahm B, Köstering L, Unterrainer JM (2011). Reviewing the impact of problem structure on planning: a software tool for analyzing tower tasks. Behavioural Brain Research 216(1):1–8. doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.07.029
  3. Kaller CP, Unterrainer JM, Rahm B, Halsband U (2004). The impact of problem structure on planning: insights from the Tower of London task. Cognitive Brain Research 20(3):462–472. doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.04.002
  4. Berg WK, Byrd DL, McNamara JP, Case K (2010). Deconstructing the tower: parameters and predictors of problem difficulty on the Tower of London task. Brain and Cognition 72(3):472–482. doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2010.01.002
  5. Schumacher LV, Rahm B, Kaller CP, Schyle V, Weiller C, Unterrainer JM (2026). A novel index to measure pre-planning in the Tower of London task: test–retest reliability and known-group validity. British Journal of Psychology 117(3):1007–1025. doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70044
  6. Unterrainer JM, Rahm B, Leonhart R, Ruff CC, Halsband U (2003). The Tower of London: the impact of instructions, cueing, and learning on planning abilities. Cognitive Brain Research 17(3):675–683. doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00191-5
  7. Phillips LH, Wynn VE, McPherson S, Gilhooly KJ (2001). Mental planning and the Tower of London task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 54(2):579–597. doi.org/10.1080/713755977
  8. Jablonska K, Stanczyk M, Piotrowska M, Szymaszek A, Lukomska B, Bednarek H, Szelag E (2022). Age as a moderator of the relationship between planning and temporal information processing. Scientific Reports 12:1548. doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05316-6
  9. Piper BJ, Mueller ST, Geerken AR, Dixon KL, Kroliczak G, Olsen RHJ, Miller JK (2015). Reliability and validity of neurobehavioral function on the Psychology Experimental Building Language test battery in young adults. PeerJ 3:e1460. doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1460

How we made this page: scrieved bi the Helibrain team fae the studies listed abuin, an checked bi Robert(Inglis) (PhD candidate in biophysics) on 11/4/2026. We update it when the soorces chynges.