Skip tae content

Reaction-time test

Hou fast dae ye react? Tap whan the circle turns green. Aboot a meenit, free: nae sign-up, nae email, an yer hale result shaws richt here.

Bi the Helibrain teamChecked bi Robert(Inglis), PhD candidate in biophysicsPit oot Last checked

Hou tae read yer score

  • Average reaction time: the mean o yer timed taps, in milliseconds (ms). A lower number is faster.
  • Fastest tap: yer quickest single tap. Ae lucky tap says less than the average.
  • Slow taps: taps slower than 500 ms. Sleep researchers ca these lapses o attention, an they become mair common efter short sleep [1].
  • Early taps: taps afore the circle turned green, or under 100 ms, which is ower fast tae be a real response. They’re left oot o yer average.

The chart shawes lab averages by age. A browser reads slower than lab gear (see belaw), sae uise the chart for the pattern an compare yer nummer wi yer ain earlier runs.

Dot chart o average simple reaction time by age group on lab gear: 218 ms at 18–24, 221 at 25–31, 225 at 32–38, 228 at 39–45, 234 at 46–51, 236 at 51–58 an 239 ms at 59–65.
Figure 1. Average simple reaction time by age on precisely timed lab gear: 218 ms at ages 18–24, 221 at 25–31, 225 at 32–38, 228 at 39–45, 234 at 46–51, 236 at 51–58 an 239 ms at 59–65. Data: Woods 2015, 1,469 adults in New Zealand, screen an mouse delay no removed [2].

Cite this page: Reaction-time test. Helibrain. 2026. https://helibrain.com/sco/reaction-time-test. CC BY 4.0.

Whit's a guid reaction time?

A normal simple reaction time on precise lab gear is aboot 230 ms. In 1,469 adults aged 18 tae 65, the average wis 231 ms, frae 218 ms at ages 18–24 tae 239 ms at ages 59–65 [2]. A browser test reads slower, acause phones an computers add their ain delay: 58 tae 133 ms in ae lab check [3]. Sae compare yer score wi yer ain earlier runs.

Quick facts

  • Whit it measures: simple reaction time, the time tae answer ae expected signal wi ae movement. This test is a ane-minute version o the Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT), a research task for alertness [4].
  • Normal value: 231 ms on average in 1,469 adults, on a lab screen an gamin mouse. The spread atween fowk (ae standard deviation) wis aboot 27 ms [2].
  • Age: aboot 0.55 ms slower ilka year atween 18 an 65 [2]. In 7,130 UK adults, simple reaction time slowed little till aboot age 50 [5].
  • Device: the same 44 adults averaged 284 ms on a lab button box an 379 ms on a touchscreen version o the same test [6].
  • Sleep: loss o sleep slows responses an adds lapses, responses o hauf a second or mair [1].

Hou the reaction-time test works

Three steps: 1, wait while the circle is grey for a random time; 2, tap as sune as it turns green; 3, the time frae green tae yer tap is recorded, an the roonds repeat.
Figure 2. Ae roond o the test. The wait is random, sae ye cannae time yer tap in advance.

Cite this page: Reaction-time test. Helibrain. 2026. https://helibrain.com/sco/reaction-time-test. CC BY 4.0.

  1. Tap whan it turns green. Tap, click or press Space or Enter.

This is the same test as in the Helibrain app. The page starts the clock whan it tells yer browser tae shaw the green circle, an stops it whan yer tap comes in. Sae yer time includes yer screen's delay an yer mouse, keyboard or touchscreen delay, which a wab page cannae measure.

Whit affects yer reaction time?

  • Yer device. In lab checks, wab pages added 58 tae 133 ms tae ilk response, dependin on the device an browser [3]. E'en wi a lab-grade button, browsers added 8 tae 67 ms [7]. On a touchscreen yer finger maun travel tae the glass an aw, which added aboot 95 ms in ae study [6].
  • Sleep. Efter a nicht wi nae sleep, or several short nichts, responses slow doon an lang lapses become common [1]. Lapse an speed measures pick this up weel [8].
  • Time o day. Attention follows a daily rhythm. For somebody that sleeps frae 11 pm tae 7 am, reactions are slowest at nicht an in the early mornin, an better in the efternuin an early evenin [9].
  • Caffeine. A major review fund that aboot 40 tae 300 mg o caffeine improves alertness, vigilance an reaction time [10].
  • Alcohol. In a placebo-controlled trial wi 16 young men, alcohol that raised blood alcohol tae aboot 0.07% slowed simple reaction time by aboot 43 ms at its peak [11].
  • Age. The gap atween the youngest an auldest groups in Figure 1 is aboot 21 ms. The study estimated that the extra time gangs intae startin the movement, no seein the signal [2].
  • Practice. Simple reaction time hardly changes wi practice. In 48 adults tested ance a week for three weeks, the average moved by less than 3 ms [12]. Across 36 studies, fowk got a wee bittie faster on the second try, then levelled aff [13].
  • Action video games. Regular action-game players responded aboot 11% faster than non-players, wi the same accuracy, maistly on choice tasks [14]. Maist o thae studies compared fowk that already played, sae the games micht no be the cause.
Bar chart o extra milliseconds: lab screen an mouse 18 ms; age 18–24 versus 59–65, 21 ms; alcohol at aboot 0.07% blood alcohol, 43 ms; browser wi a lab button box, 8 tae 67 ms; wab page on phones an laptops, 58 tae 133 ms; touchscreen versus lab button box, 95 ms.
Figure 3. Whit adds milliseconds tae a reaction time, in published measurements. Data: Woods 2015 [2]; Pérez-Mañá 2022 [11]; Bridges 2020 [7]; Pronk 2020 [3]; Grandner 2018 [6].

Cite this page: Reaction-time test. Helibrain. 2026. https://helibrain.com/sco/reaction-time-test. CC BY 4.0.

Whit this test can an cannae tell ye

The test measures hou fast ye answer ae expected signal, juist noo, on this device. It disnae measure intelligence, fitness tae drive or ony health condition, an it isnae a diagnosis.

Device delay is the biggest limit: it is mair than the hale age gap in Figure 1, an it differs atween devices. That matters maist whan comparin ae person wi anither [3]. Sae compare yer nummer wi yer ain earlier scores on the same device an browser.

Ane meenit is a snapshot. Shorter versions o the PVT still detect loss o sleep, wi smawer effects than the 10-minute version [15]. If yer reaction time worries ye, for example efter an illness or a new medicine, speak tae a doctor.

Frequently asked questions

Is 200 ms a guid reaction time?

Aye, 200 ms is fast for a simple reaction-time test in a browser. On precise lab gear, adults aged 18–24 averaged 218 ms, an aboot 200 ms ance the lab's ain screen an mouse delay wis removed [2]. Browsers an phones add mair delay than lab gear [3]. On ae popular reaction-test wabsite, the median o ower 81 million clicks is 273 ms [16].

Whit is the average reaction time by age?

In a lab study o 1,469 adults, the average simple reaction time rose slowly wi age: 218 ms at ages 18–24, 228 ms at 39–45 an 239 ms at 59–65, aboot hauf a millisecond ilka year [2]. In a UK survey o 7,130 adults, simple reaction time changed little till aboot age 50, while choice reaction time slowed through adulthood [5].

Whyever is ma reaction time slower on ma phone?

A reaction-time test on a phone adds twa delays. Yer finger maun travel tae the glass, an the phone an browser tak time tae register the touch. Whan the same 44 adults took a vigilance test on a lab button box an on a touchscreen, they averaged 284 ms an 379 ms [6]. Compare phone scores wi phone scores.

Can I improve ma reaction time?

Practice changes simple reaction time verra little: in a three-week study, averages moved by less than 3 ms [12]. Sleep, alertness an the device matter mair: loss o sleep slows responses [1], an moderate caffeine improves reaction time [10].

Is the Helibrain reaction-time test really free?

Aye. The Helibrain reaction-time test an yer hale result are free: nae sign-up, nae email, nae payment, an naething is held back for a "full report". Helibrain maks siller frae its app, which has a free plan an paid plans; ye dinnae need the app tae tak the test or see yer result.

Is a reaction-time test the same as a reflex test?

Naw. A reflex test, like the doctor's knee tap, checks an automatic response that happens wi nae decision. A reaction-time test measures a voluntary response: ye see the signal, decide, an move. The Helibrain reaction-time test measures that voluntary speed, sae it disnae tell ye onything aboot yer reflexes or nerves.

See aw 43 free brain tests

Want tae wark on this ilka day? The Helibrain app (in Inglis for noo) has a free plan an paid plans.

Cite this page: Reaction-time test. Helibrain. 2026. https://helibrain.com/sco/reaction-time-test. CC BY 4.0.

Common questions

How this test works

This test measures how fast you react to a signal you are waiting for. The circle stays grey for a random time, then turns green. Tap, click, or press Space or Enter as soon as you see green. After one practice round you play 10 timed rounds. Your score is the average time of your timed taps, in milliseconds. Taps that come too early are left out. Psychology labs have timed simple reactions like this since the 1860s.

Version 1 · Cite this test:

Helibrain (2026). Reaction time test, v1. https://helibrain.com/reaction-time-test/methods

Full method →

Sources

  1. Lim J, Dinges DF (2008). Sleep deprivation an tent attention. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1129:305–322. doi.org/10.1196/annals.1417.002
  2. Woods DL, Wyma JM, Yund EW, Herron TJ, Reed B (2015). Factors that affect the delay in a simple reaction-time test. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9:131. doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00131 (free full text: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4374455/)
  3. Pronk T, Wiers RW, Molenkamp B, Murre J (2020). Mind-time in yer pouch? The accuracy o timin in web apps on touch-screen an keyboard devices. Behavior Research Methods 52(3):1371–1382. doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01321-2 (free full text: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7280355/)
  4. Dinges DF, Powell JW (1985). Microcomputer analyses o performance in a portable, simple sicht reaction-time task durin lang operations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 17(6):652–655. doi.org/10.3758/BF03200977
  5. Der G, Deary IJ (2006). Differences in reaction time by age an sex in adulthood: results fae the Unitit Kinrick Health an Lifestyle Survey. Psychology and Aging 21(1):62–73. doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.62
  6. Grandner MA, Watson NF, Kay M, Ocaño D, Kientz JA (2018). Meetin the need tae check a touch-screen psychomotor vigilance task: key things tae consider in sleep health research. Sleep Health 4(5):387–389. doi.org/10.1016/j.sleh.2018.08.003 (free full text: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6152888/)
  7. Bridges D, Pitiot A, MacAskill MR, Peirce JW (2020). The big timin study: comparin a range o experiment makers, baith lab-based an online. PeerJ 8:e9414. doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9414
  8. Basner M, Dinges DF (2011). Giein the psychomotor vigilance test (PVT) the best chance tae spot the effects o sleep loss. Sleep 34(5):581–591. doi.org/10.1093/sleep/34.5.581 (free full text: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3079937/)
  9. Valdez P (2019). Circadian rhythms in attention. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 92(1):81–92. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6430172/
  10. McLellan TM, Caldwell JA, Lieberman HR (2016). A review o the effects o caffeine on cognitive, physical an work performance. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 71:294–312. doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.001
  11. Pérez-Mañá C, Mateus JA, Díaz-Pellicer P, et al. (2022). Effects o mixin energy drinks wi alcohol on skills needit for drivin. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 25(1):13–25. doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyab051 (free full text: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8756085/)
  12. Woods DL, Wyma JM, Yund EW, Herron TJ (2015). The effects o repeat testin, pretendin tae dae ill, an traumatic brain injury on high-precision measures o simple sicht reaction time. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9:540. doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00540
  13. Scharfen J, Blum D, Holling H (2018). Response time gets shorter efter retest in mental speed tests: a meta-analysis. Journal of Intelligence 6(1):6. doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6010006
  14. Dye MWG, Green CS, Bavelier D (2009). Speedin up processin wi action video gemmes. Current Directions in Psychological Science 18(6):321–326. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01660.x (free full text: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2871325/)
  15. Basner M, Mollicone D, Dinges DF (2011). The validity an sensitivity o a short psychomotor vigilance test (PVT-B) for total an pairtial sleep deprivation. Acta Astronautica 69(11–12):949–959. doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.07.015 (free full text: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3197786/)
  16. Human Benchmark. Reaction time statistics (statistics fae the site's users, mixed devices; nae method published). humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime/statistics (checked 3 November 2026)

How we made this page: scrieved bi the Helibrain team fae the studies listed abuin, an checked bi Robert(Inglis) (PhD candidate in biophysics) on 11/3/2026. We update it when the soorces chynges.