Make di pattern match di target wit di fewest moves: plan ahead, den move. E dey take about 5 minutes, na free, and no need sign up.
Na Helibrain team write amRobert(English), PhD student for biophysics, don review amDem publish am Dem last review am
Wetin dis game dey measure
Tower of London na classic planning puzzle wey come from psychology research. You dey move coloured balls between three pegs wey get different heights to make dem match target pattern wit di fewest moves. E dey show how well you fit think some steps ahead before you act [1].
Neuropsychologist Tim Shallice design di task for 1982 to study planning [1]. Every problem get smallest number of moves, and di task dey record whether you reach di target wit dat number, how many extra moves you need, and how long you think before your first move. E resemble Tower of Hanoi small, but di rules and problems no be di same.
Number of moves no be di only thing wey dey make problem hard. Problems wey leave di order of moves open for di target, or wey first make you move one ball comot for road, dey take people more time to plan, even when di number of moves na di same [2][3][4].
How di game dey work
- Three pegs fit hold 3, 2 and 1 balls. Move one ball each time: na only ball wey dey top you fit move, and no put am on peg wey don full.
- Each problem dey show di target and di fewest moves wey e go take. Make di target match wit dat number of moves for perfect solve.
- 16 problems, from 2 to 6 moves, and dem dey get harder. Each one go end after 60 seconds or 20 moves.
- Tap ball, den tap peg wey you wan put am on, or drag am go there. For keyboard, keys 1, 2 and 3 dey pick up and put down ball.
- Small practice problem go come first (you fit skip am). Each run go paint di balls wit new colours, so second try go look new but e go still hard di same way.
We make our own set of problems. Computer search wey check all 36 positions of di balls confirm say di fewest moves for each problem correct. From 3 moves and up, every problem get only one shortest solution. Di targets mix di three shapes wey researchers dey change: all balls for one peg, two and one, and one for each peg [2].
How to understand your score
- Solve am wit di fewest moves: na your main score, how many perfect solves you get.
- Extra moves: moves wey pass di fewest, for problems wey you solve.
- Thinking before di first move: how long you look before you touch ball. Researchers dey call am initial planning time.
- How you solve am: di part of your time wey you spend before di first move for di longer problems. Bigger part mean say you plan more of di solution for your head first.
For one study of 179 adults, people wey spend bigger part of their time planning before di first move tend to solve more problems wit di fewest moves [5]. Telling people make dem plan first help for one study [6], but e no help for another one, where people plan for longer but no do better for their moves [7]. So treat “how you solve am” as description of dis run, no be rule.
After enough people don play, your result go also show where you dey among other people wey play dis game, as one group: below typical, typical or above typical. Na group, no be exact rank, because one run of dis task fit only show roughly how you plan (see below). Di other players na people wey visit dis site, dem no be sample wey represent everybody.
Wetin be normal score?
No norms dey for dis version. For research version wey get 24 harder problems (4 to 6 moves), young adults solve average about 17 out of 24 wit di fewest moves, and adults age 61 to 77 solve about 13 [8]. Our problems, time limits and screens different, so use these numbers as background, no be standard to judge yourself by.
Wetin dis game fit and no fit tell you
Dem dey use Tower of London for research on planning and clinical assessment, but dis page na game, e no be clinical test. E no dey measure intelligence, and one run na just one snapshot: tiredness and di device wey you use dey change how you do.
For one study of 79 young adults wey do computer Tower of London two times, two weeks apart, their move scores for di two days agree only small-small (correlation of 0.15), but dem become faster to solve [9]. So take one result as rough guide, and look at several tries for different days instead of one number.
Questions people dey ask
Wetin Tower of London test dey measure?
Tower of London na di same thing as Tower of Hanoi?
No. Dem both dey move pieces between three pegs, but for Tower of Hanoi you dey move stack of discs wey get different sizes, and you no fit ever put big disc on top small one. For Tower of London, di balls get di same size, di pegs fit hold different number of balls, and each problem get its own target pattern.
E better to plan first or try moves?
Helibrain Tower of London test na free?
Yes. Di game and your full result dey free: no sign up, no email, no payment. Helibrain dey make money from its app, wey you no need for dis game.
Other tests wey relate to am
- Test for connecting pointsHow quick you join circles for order, and switch between numbers and letters.
- Test for matrix reasoningHow well you spot the rules for pattern and use dem.
- Test for sense of directionHow well you fit find your way from map wey you see once, and point back to where you start from.
See all di 43 free tests wey check brain
You wan work on dis every day? Di Helibrain app (for English for now) get free plan and plans wey you pay for.
Cite dis page: Tower of London Test. Helibrain. 2026. https://helibrain.com/pcm/tower-of-london-test. CC BY 4.0.
How this test works
This puzzle measures planning: thinking a few moves ahead before you act. Three pegs hold 3, 2 and 1 balls. Move one ball at a time to copy the goal picture in as few moves as possible. There are 16 problems that need 2 to 6 moves, and each one shows its fewest moves. Your main score is how many problems you solve in exactly the fewest moves. The neuropsychologist Tim Shallice designed this puzzle in 1982.
Version 1 · Cite this test:
Helibrain (2026). Tower of London test, v1. https://helibrain.com/tower-of-london-test/methods
Sources
- Shallice T (1982). Specific impairments of planning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 298(1089):199–209. doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1982.0082
- Kaller CP, Rahm B, Köstering L, Unterrainer JM (2011). Reviewing the impact of problem structure on planning: a software tool for analyzing tower tasks. Behavioural Brain Research 216(1):1–8. doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.07.029
- Kaller CP, Unterrainer JM, Rahm B, Halsband U (2004). The impact of problem structure on planning: insights from the Tower of London task. Cognitive Brain Research 20(3):462–472. doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.04.002
- Berg WK, Byrd DL, McNamara JP, Case K (2010). Deconstructing the tower: parameters and predictors of problem difficulty on the Tower of London task. Brain and Cognition 72(3):472–482. doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2010.01.002
- Schumacher LV, Rahm B, Kaller CP, Schyle V, Weiller C, Unterrainer JM (2026). A novel index to measure pre-planning in the Tower of London task: test–retest reliability and known-group validity. British Journal of Psychology 117(3):1007–1025. doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70044
- Unterrainer JM, Rahm B, Leonhart R, Ruff CC, Halsband U (2003). The Tower of London: the impact of instructions, cueing, and learning on planning abilities. Cognitive Brain Research 17(3):675–683. doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00191-5
- Phillips LH, Wynn VE, McPherson S, Gilhooly KJ (2001). Mental planning and the Tower of London task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 54(2):579–597. doi.org/10.1080/713755977
- Jablonska K, Stanczyk M, Piotrowska M, Szymaszek A, Lukomska B, Bednarek H, Szelag E (2022). Age as a moderator of the relationship between planning and temporal information processing. Scientific Reports 12:1548. doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05316-6
- Piper BJ, Mueller ST, Geerken AR, Dixon KL, Kroliczak G, Olsen RHJ, Miller JK (2015). Reliability and validity of neurobehavioral function on the Psychology Experimental Building Language test battery in young adults. PeerJ 3:e1460. doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1460
How we take make dis page: di Helibrain team write am from di studies wey dem list above, and Robert(English) (PhD student for biophysics) review am on 4 Nọvẹ́mba 2026. We dey update am wen di sources change.