Oʻzbekcha

London minorasi rejalash testi

Rangli sharlarni bittadan koʻchirib, namunaga moslang. Bepul, roʻyxatdan oʻtishsiz. Toʻliq natija shu sahifada.

Helibrain jamoasiRobert, biofizika boʻyicha doktorant, tekshirganChop etilgan: Oxirgi tekshiruv:

Maqsadni eng kam yurishda takrorlang

Rangli sharlarni bittadan koʻchirib, namunaga moslang. Har topshiriqda eng kam yurish soni bor. Avval oʻylang, keyin yuring.

16 ta topshiriq, 2–6 yurish, tobora qiyin. Faqat ustki shar koʻchadi, tayoq sigʻimidan oshmaydi. Avval qisqa mashq topshirigʻi bor.

Embed this test

London minorasi rejalash testi

Copy this code into an HTML block on your website. Keep the text link below the test so readers can find the original.

Optional. Without the script, the test stays in a scrollable frame. Your editor must allow scripts to use automatic resizing.

Free to embed. Keep the test, Helibrain credit and link intact; do not alter the test or present it as your own.

Live preview

Qanday oʻynaladi?

Rangli sharlarni bittadan koʻchirib, namunaga moslang. Har topshiriqda eng kam yurish soni bor. Avval oʻylang, keyin yuring.

Natijani qanday tushunish kerak?

Eng kam yurish kompyuter qidiruvi bilan topilgan, shu bois mukammal yechim haqiqatan eng qisqa. Bu ekrandagi oʻyin, klinik test emas. Oʻz keyingi urinishingizni solishtiring.

Koʻp soʻraladigan savollar

Test bepulmi?

Ha. Toʻliq natija bepul, roʻyxatdan oʻtish, email yoki toʻlov shart emas. Natijalar adolatli taqqoslashlar uchun saqlanadi. Maxfiylik siyosati tafsilotlarni tushuntiradi.

Oʻxshash testlar

Barcha 43 ta bepul aqliy test

Har kuni shugʻullanmoqchimisiz? Helibrain ilovasida (hozircha inglizcha) bepul va pulli rejalar bor.

Manbalar

  1. Shallice T (1982). Specific impairments of planning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 298(1089):199–209. doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1982.0082
  2. Kaller CP, Rahm B, Köstering L, Unterrainer JM (2011). Reviewing the impact of problem structure on planning: a software tool for analyzing tower tasks. Behavioural Brain Research 216(1):1–8. doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.07.029
  3. Kaller CP, Unterrainer JM, Rahm B, Halsband U (2004). The impact of problem structure on planning: insights from the Tower of London task. Cognitive Brain Research 20(3):462–472. doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.04.002
  4. Berg WK, Byrd DL, McNamara JP, Case K (2010). Deconstructing the tower: parameters and predictors of problem difficulty on the Tower of London task. Brain and Cognition 72(3):472–482. doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2010.01.002
  5. Schumacher LV, Rahm B, Kaller CP, Schyle V, Weiller C, Unterrainer JM (2026). A novel index to measure pre-planning in the Tower of London task: test–retest reliability and known-group validity. British Journal of Psychology 117(3):1007–1025. doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70044
  6. Unterrainer JM, Rahm B, Leonhart R, Ruff CC, Halsband U (2003). The Tower of London: the impact of instructions, cueing, and learning on planning abilities. Cognitive Brain Research 17(3):675–683. doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00191-5
  7. Phillips LH, Wynn VE, McPherson S, Gilhooly KJ (2001). Mental planning and the Tower of London task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 54(2):579–597. doi.org/10.1080/713755977
  8. Jablonska K, Stanczyk M, Piotrowska M, Szymaszek A, Lukomska B, Bednarek H, Szelag E (2022). Age as a moderator of the relationship between planning and temporal information processing. Scientific Reports 12:1548. doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05316-6
  9. Piper BJ, Mueller ST, Geerken AR, Dixon KL, Kroliczak G, Olsen RHJ, Miller JK (2015). Reliability and validity of neurobehavioral function on the Psychology Experimental Building Language test battery in young adults. PeerJ 3:e1460. doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1460

Sahifani Helibrain jamoasi yuqoridagi tadqiqotlar asosida yozgan. Biofizika boʻyicha doktorant Robert 4-noyabr, 2026 kuni tekshirgan. Manbalar oʻzgarsa, sahifani yangilaymiz.