Skip to content

The ability behind the score

Working memory

Working memory keeps information available while you use it: carrying a number through a calculation, following a sentence, or updating where an object was. A classic review puts capacity near 4 chunks under restrictive conditions; that is not a universal four-digit limit or a target score for our games. 1

Last reviewed · 13 references

Explore the tests and tools ↓

01 / Understand

What it is

A workspace, with help from what you already know

Holding a phone number briefly is storage. Reordering it, combining it with another number or replacing its first digit adds control. Working memory is the temporary workspace that supports those operations. Long-term knowledge supplies familiar words, patterns and strategies, so the same sequence can be easier for an expert than a beginner. Capacity depends on what counts as a meaningful chunk. 2

In a simplified brain-system account, frontal and parietal networks help maintain goals and direct attention, while sensory and language systems help represent the particular material. There is no single working-memory box, and a browser score cannot tell us which brain area was more active. Executive control and working memory overlap; they are not interchangeable labels for every difficult task. 3

Helibrain lets you approach this distinction from several angles. Number memory asks for a sequence back; n-back asks whether the current item matches an earlier one; visual and sequence games use locations. Those differences matter more than which game produces the largest-looking score. A strong result in one format can coexist with a modest result in another without either being wrong. 4

How we measure it

Task familyWhat researchers askWhat the score also depends on
Forward digit spanRepeat a spoken sequence in orderHearing, rehearsal, presentation rate and stopping rule
Complex spanRemember items while solving intervening problemsBoth storage and processing demands
N-backCompare each item with one presented earlierUpdating, recognition and response decisions
Visual change detectionDecide whether a remembered array changedSet size, visual discriminability and guessing

These are related measurements, not interchangeable units. Complex-span and n-back tasks share only part of their individual-difference variance. Calling a high n-back level a digit span, or converting one into an IQ, skips the validation that would be needed. 4

Our visual number-memory game is not the auditory protocol in Woods and colleagues’ digit-span study. Their work shows that maximum span, total correct and an adaptive mean-span measure give different answers even within one task family. Keep the rule and scoring method attached to a result. 5

Age and norms: what is a fair comparison?

The table below reproduces scaled digit-span scores, not numbers of digits, from Ye and colleagues’ Chinese normative sample. The scale was formed across all 723 participants, with mean 10 and standard deviation 3; these age-group means are not separately age-normalized scores. Participants were Mandarin-reading adults aged 18–59. 6

Age in yearsMean scaled scoreStandard deviation
18–2911.222.87
30–399.892.92
40–499.132.77
50–598.932.84

Source: the article’s age-group table, panel A. Education and the particular digit-span procedure matter. None of these cells is a percentile lookup for Helibrain. A separate large online study found working-memory task peaks around age 30, illustrating that the chosen task and sample alter the curve. These are group comparisons, not a forecast of an individual’s future. 7

02 / Put it in context

What affects it

Evidence labels answer “is there an effect on this outcome?” They do not promise a particular gain. Where a Helibrain evidence-base rating exists, its population and outcome stay attached. “Not graded” means we have no matching rating; it does not mean no effect. Age and device findings are measurement evidence, not treatment grades.

Sleep

Good evidence

Stored rating: total sleep loss → working-memory accuracy; mostly healthy adults.

Working-memory performance can suffer after total sleep deprivation. The evidence-base existence rating is Moderate; it does not specify your score change after one short night. 8

Stress

Limited evidence

Stored rating: acute stress → working memory.

Acute laboratory stress may impair working memory, particularly under heavier demands. Our matching existence rating is Low; effects depend on the stressor and task timing. 9

Exercise

Too little evidence

Stored rating: broad pooled exercise → general cognition.

Our broad exercise estimate has Very low certainty. It cannot establish a predictable working-memory gain for a healthy individual or validate our exercise check as a trial. 10

Age

Age comparisons

Measurement finding; not an intervention grade.

Use a norm sample with the same task, scoring and relevant demographics. The age table here is contextual evidence, not a rule that everyone loses a fixed amount. 6

Practice

Too little evidence

Stored rating: transfer from working-memory training to other working-memory tasks.

Trained-task gains are different from transfer. Our near-transfer rating is Very low; familiar strategies and repeated stimuli can raise a game score without broad improvement. 11

Devices

Timing evidence

Measurement finding; not a treatment grade.

Screen presentation and input timing can differ across devices. Use the same device and mode for repeated sessions, especially when presentation time or response speed contributes. 12

What transfers, and what does not?

Improvement has a destination

Learning a task can make you better at that task. A harder question is whether the improvement reaches unfamiliar tasks that use similar processes. The n-back training literature shows a gradient: performance changes depend on how similar the outcome is to the training. It does not justify treating a higher game level as a larger general mental capacity. 11

Far transfer means improvement in a more distant outcome, such as intelligence, academic achievement or everyday functioning. A major working-memory training meta-analysis did not find convincing broad far-transfer benefits. Helibrain’s games therefore offer practice and a way to observe task performance; we do not present them as a way to raise intelligence. 13

A practical distinction is between changing your capacity and changing the demand. A note, diagram or written intermediate calculation can reduce what you need to keep active. That is a sensible use of an external aid, not evidence that the aid changed the size of working memory. Our concept-map and study tools support organizing a task; their usefulness should be judged on that task.

03 / Try and compare

Try it on Helibrain

Start with a storage task and an updating task, then read their separate explanations. Record the input mode, whether you rehearsed aloud or grouped items, and whether the task was familiar. A “best ever” score after many attempts answers a different question from a typical first-session score.

The cards below distinguish direct task practice from tools that help you organize material. They do not share a combined working-memory percentile. If you want a personal comparison, keep conditions similar and look for a pattern across sessions rather than a single impressive run.

Tests and games

Tools and practice

Related answers

Frequently asked questions

Is working memory the same as short-term memory?

They overlap. Short-term storage keeps material briefly available; working-memory tasks often add updating or processing. The distinction depends on the task definition. 2

Is seven digits a normal working-memory score?

Digit span depends on presentation and scoring. A familiar seven-digit sequence and an unfamiliar sequence of seven chunks do not place the same demand on memory. 5

Does a higher n-back level mean a higher IQ?

No validated IQ conversion follows from one n-back level. Working-memory training evidence does not establish a broad intelligence gain. 13

References

Links lead to the original DOI or source record. Research comparisons describe the cited tasks, not a validation of our browser versions.

  1. Cowan (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity.
  2. Conway et al. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide.
  3. Diamond (2012). Executive Functions.
  4. Redick et al. (2013). Complex span and n-back measures of working memory: A meta-analysis.
  5. Woods et al. (2010). Improving digit span assessment of short-term verbal memory.
  6. Ye et al. (2022). The Chinese Brief Cognitive Test: Normative Data Stratified by Gender, Age and Education.
  7. Hartshorne & Germine (2015). When Does Cognitive Functioning Peak? The Asynchronous Rise and Fall of Different Cognitive Abilities Across the Life Span.
  8. Lim et al. (2010). A meta-analysis of the impact of short-term sleep deprivation on cognitive variables..
  9. Shields et al. (2016). The effects of acute stress on core executive functions: A meta-analysis and comparison with cortisol.
  10. Singh et al. (2025). Effectiveness of exercise for improving cognition, memory and executive function: a systematic umbrella review and meta-meta-analysis.
  11. Soveri et al. (2017). Working memory training revisited: A multi-level meta-analysis of n-back training studies.
  12. Anwyl-Irvine et al. (2020). Realistic precision and accuracy of online experiment platforms, web browsers, and devices.
  13. Melby-Lervåg et al. (2016). Working Memory Training Does Not Improve Performance on Measures of Intelligence or Other Measures of “Far Transfer”.