Skip to content

Free IQ-style test

Five short sections: pattern puzzles, numbers to remember, a speed sprint, turned shapes and words. About 25 minutes, free, no sign-up. An honest estimate with its range, not a clinical IQ test. We save scores, with your IP address and country, to build comparisons.

By the Helibrain teamReviewed by Robert, biophysics PhD candidatePublished Last reviewed

Five sections, about 25 minutes

  1. 1Reasoning: pattern puzzles
  2. 2Working memory: numbers forward and backward
  3. 3Processing speed: match symbols to digits
  4. 4Visual-spatial: same shape or mirror image?
  5. 5Verbal: word questions

You can take a break between sections and continue later in this browser. A few questions are being tried out for future versions and don't count. Your first attempt is the one that counts most: scores rise with practice.

Your age (optional)

Helps us compare like with like later. Under 16: you get your scores, without a comparison.

What this test is, and what it isn't

This is an IQ-style test you take on your own, in your browser. It covers five areas that full intelligence tests also cover: reasoning, working memory, processing speed, visual-spatial thinking and verbal skills. It is not a clinical or official IQ test, which is given in person by a psychologist with norms from a carefully chosen sample. Don't use the result for school, work or medical decisions.

Online scores also run a little high: people tested without supervision score about a fifth of a standard deviation higher than people tested in a room with a proctor [3]. And a retake gains about a third of a standard deviation from practice alone [2], so your first attempt is the fairer one.

How your score is worked out

The reasoning puzzles come from a published research item bank. Each puzzle was tried by 2,561 young adults applying to medical school in Germany, so we know how hard each one is and how well it separates stronger from weaker reasoners [1]. From your answers we estimate where you would stand in that group, with a likely range rather than a single number.

That group scores above the general population, so we move the estimate onto the usual IQ scale (average 100) with an adjustment based on education statistics. The adjustment is itself an estimate, so the range you see includes its uncertainty too. Scores below 70 and above 130 are shown only as "below 70" or "above 130": a short test can't place them precisely.

The other four sections show your raw score for now, with "comparison coming". We only show a number on the IQ scale for an area once we have enough first attempts to compare it fairly, and an overall estimate only once every area has one. Under-16s see their scores without a comparison: the research groups were older.

The five sections

  • Reasoning. Pattern puzzles: a 3 × 3 grid with the last square missing. Instead of picking from a few answers, you build the missing square from 20 parts, so guessing doesn't help. Up to 90 seconds per puzzle. Two practice puzzles first.
  • Working memory. A number flashes up; type it back, then later backward. It grows by one digit each time you get it right, like the classic digit span [4].
  • Processing speed. Match symbols to digits with a key, as many as you can in a short sprint. Try the symbol digit test on its own too.
  • Visual-spatial. Is the turned shape the same, or its mirror image? Based on a classic experiment [5].
  • Verbal. Our own word questions: words that mean the same, word pairs and the odd one out. Everyday English, no trivia.

A few questions are new ones we are trying out for future versions. They don't count towards your score.

Credits

The reasoning puzzles are from the Open Matrices Item Bank by Marco Koch, Frank M. Spinath, Samuel Greiff and Nicolas Becker [1], free to use under the GNU General Public License, version 3. We draw them from the published item data. All other questions were written for Helibrain.

See all 17 free brain tests

Want to work on this daily? The Helibrain app has a free plan and paid plans.

Sources

  1. Koch M, Spinath FM, Greiff S, Becker N (2022). Development and Validation of the Open Matrices Item Bank. Journal of Intelligence 10(3):41. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10030041
  2. Scharfen J, Peters JM, Holling H (2018). Retest effects in cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis. Intelligence 67:44–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2018.01.003
  3. Steger D, Schroeders U, Gnambs T (2020). A meta-analysis of test scores in proctored and unproctored ability assessments. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 36(1):174–184. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000494
  4. Woods DL, Kishiyama MM, Yund EW, et al. (2011). Improving digit span assessment of short-term verbal memory. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 33(1):101–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2010.493149
  5. Shepard RN, Metzler J (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 171(3972):701–703. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3972.701

How we made this page: written by the Helibrain team from the studies listed above, and reviewed by Robert (biophysics PhD candidate) on 3 November 2026. We update it when the sources change.