By the Helibrain team · Reviewed by Robert, biophysics PhD candidate · Last checked: 2026-10-31
What this test measures
"Attention span" is an everyday phrase. What researchers measure is sustained attention, also called vigilance: staying ready for a signal that comes at random moments. This page runs the brief Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT-B), a 3-minute version of the 10-minute PVT, made for real-world settings where 10 minutes is too long [1]. The original PVT was designed to track how alertness drops during long stretches of work without sleep [2].
The rules follow the published brief version: the circle turns green after a random 1 to 4 seconds (including the 1 second your time is shown), a tap 355 ms or slower counts as a lapse, and a tap under 100 ms or before the green circle is a false start [1].
How to read your score
- Slow taps (lapses): the number to watch. Each one is a moment your attention slipped. Lapses rise clearly when people are short on sleep [3].
- Average reaction time: your mean speed over the whole run.
- Early taps: taps before green. A lot of them can mean you were guessing instead of waiting.
There is no fair "normal" number to give you: phones, screens and mice add their own delay, and a touchscreen version of the PVT measured the same people about 95 ms slower than the lab device [5]. Compare with your own runs on the same device.
Why is the test so boring?
On purpose. Keeping your focus on a dull task is exactly the skill being measured. Early in a run most people do well; slips tend to show up as the minutes go by, and they show up more when you are tired [3].
What affects sustained attention?
In a meta-analysis of short-term sleep loss, simple attention and vigilance tasks were among the measures hit hardest [4]. Time of day, caffeine, distraction and practice can also move your score, so look at several runs taken at similar times instead of one.
How is this different from the reaction time test?
The reaction time test is about a minute and shows your speed. This one lasts longer, so it can catch the lapses that come with fading focus. In research, the 3-minute version tracked the 10-minute test through total and partial sleep loss, with somewhat smaller effects [1].
Sources
- Basner M, Mollicone D, Dinges DF (2011). Validity and sensitivity of a brief psychomotor vigilance test (PVT-B) to total and partial sleep deprivation. Acta Astronautica 69(11–12):949–959. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3197786/
- Dinges DF, Powell JW (1985). Microcomputer analyses of performance on a portable, simple visual RT task during sustained operations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 17(6):652–655. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200977
- Lim J, Dinges DF (2008). Sleep deprivation and vigilant attention. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1129:305–322. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1417.002
- Lim J, Dinges DF (2010). A meta-analysis of the impact of short-term sleep deprivation on cognitive variables. Psychological Bulletin 136(3):375–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018883
- Grandner MA, Watson NF, Kay M, Ocaño D, Kientz JA (2018). Addressing the need for validation of a touchscreen psychomotor vigilance task. Sleep Health 4(5):387–389. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6152888/