By the Helibrain team · Reviewed by Robert, biophysics PhD candidate · Last checked: 2026-10-31
What this test measures
The n-back is a classic working-memory task, first described in 1958 [1]. Working memory is the small amount of information you can keep in mind and update from moment to moment. In a 2-back, you compare each square with the one two steps earlier, so you must keep the last two positions in mind and drop the oldest one with every new square. Brain-imaging studies show the task drives a network in the frontal and parietal lobes [2].
How the climb works
This is the same adaptive version as in the Helibrain app, with the squares placed on a grid (spatial n-back). The level changes with how well you do, in the style of the adaptive n-back used in working-memory research [3].
- You practise at 2-back with feedback, then start the real run at 2-back.
- Every round has 10 counted squares, 3 of them matches.
- Catch more than 90% of the matches with under 20% false taps and the level goes up. Catch fewer than 70% and it goes down.
- The first 3 rounds are guaranteed. After that, a weak round ends the test, and it stops after 6 rounds at most.
How to read your score
Your result is the level you climbed to: the highest level where you passed a round. Matches caught and false taps show how cleanly you got there. Each level up adds one more position to keep in mind.
There is no standard norm for this exact version, so compare with yourself. Expect your first few runs to improve just because the task gets familiar.
Is the n-back a pure memory test?
Does training the n-back make you smarter?
Probably not. An early study reported gains in reasoning after n-back training [3], but a large meta-analysis later found that working-memory training improves the trained tasks and similar ones, not intelligence or other distant skills [6]. Use the test to see how you are doing, not as a brain workout.
Sources
- Kirchner WK (1958). Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. Journal of Experimental Psychology 55(4):352–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043688
- Owen AM, McMillan KM, Laird AR, Bullmore E (2005). N-back working memory paradigm: a meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping 25(1):46–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20131
- Jaeggi SM, Buschkuehl M, Jonides J, Perrig WJ (2008). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. PNAS 105(19):6829–6833. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801268105
- Kane MJ, Conway ARA, Miura TK, Colflesh GJH (2007). Working memory, attention control, and the n-back task: a question of construct validity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33(3):615–622. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.615
- Jaeggi SM, Buschkuehl M, Perrig WJ, Meier B (2010). The concurrent validity of the N-back task as a working memory measure. Memory 18(4):394–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211003702171
- Melby-Lervåg M, Redick TS, Hulme C (2016). Working memory training does not improve performance on measures of intelligence or other measures of “far transfer”. Perspectives on Psychological Science 11(4):512–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616635612