A complete report using realistic made-up results from 20 participants on Stroop and go/no-go. These are example data, not observations from a real study. Try the exclusion toggle, explore the charts and save the report.
Choose Save as PDF in your browser’s print dialog. Charts and text are included in the report.
Study report
Attention and inhibition · example study
Example data — all participant results in this report are made up.
Example data — all participant results in this report are made up.
Report prepared 2026 نومبر 8
20Participants started
18Participants finished
5Participants flagged
0Participants excluded
Completion over time
Completed participants, grouped by hour (UTC).
Devices / input
Touchscreen
13
Mouse / trackpad
7
Task languages
English
20
Data quality
Flags are review cues, not proof of invalid data. Exclusion removes a participant from every task, number, chart and report if any recorded task has a flag. Missing evidence is not treated as a clean bill of health.
All started participants were retained; no quality-flag exclusions were applied.
5 of the included participants have at least one flag. 0 participants are excluded.
One dot per measured participant · tap or hover for a code
Conditions within each participant
Each line connects one participant. Large circles show the group condition medians. 20 participants with both conditions
Mean difference = 107.3 ms; 95% CI [81.8 ms, 132.7 ms]
dz = 1.85; 95% CI [1.12, 2.58]
A comparison appears only when enough public players completed the same task configuration.
گو/نو-گو ٽيسٽ
Accuracy
1:383cfc2626df5185
18Measured participants
91.4 %Mean
3.6 ppStandard deviation
Accuracy (%)
Measured participantsMeanMean ± 1 SD
One dot per measured participant · tap or hover for a code
Conditions within each participant
Each line connects one participant. Large circles show the group condition medians. 18 participants with both conditions
Mean difference = 8 percentage points; 95% CI [2.4 percentage points, 13.6 percentage points]
dz = 0.66; 95% CI [0.15, 1.17]
A comparison appears only when enough public players completed the same task configuration.
Editable starting text for a paper. Check your study design, recruitment and consent details before using it.
Methods
Example data — Participants completed اسٽروپ ٽيسٽ (version 1:4664474850ea073d) ۽ گو/نو-گو ٽيسٽ (version 1:383cfc2626df5185) in Helibrain using browser-based tasks with snapshotted configurations and scorer versions. The included sample comprised 20 participants (18 finished all tasks). Recorded timing and selected task parameters were اسٽروپ ٽيسٽ: Practice trials: 4، Scored trials: 40، Matching-colour trials: 50%، Timeout (ms): 3,000، Interstimulus interval (ms): 500، ۽ Feedback duration (ms): 700; observed mean duration 58.4 s ۽ گو/نو-گو ٽيسٽ: Total trials: 40، No-go trials: 25%، Stimulus duration (ms): 800، Interstimulus interval (ms): 600، ۽ Feedback duration (ms): 900; observed mean duration 72.2 s. Recorded input devices were Touchscreen: 13 ۽ Mouse / trackpad: 7; task languages were English: 20. All started participants were retained; no quality-flag exclusions were applied. Browser timing and advisory quality flags were recorded when available; absent telemetry was not evidence of an unflagged run. Tasks and scoring are documented in Helibrain cognitive tests: methods and scoring (concept DOI 10.5281/zenodo.24052521).
Results
Example data — Among the included participants, 18 of 20 completed the full sequence; 5 had one or more advisory quality flags. For اسٽروپ ٽيسٽ, 20 measurable results yielded a mean of 107.3 ms (SD 58 ms; 95% CI [81.8 ms, 132.7 ms]) for the measure “Extra time for mismatched colours”. For the within-participant contrast (Mismatched colours minus Matching colours; 20 pairs), the mean difference was 107.3 ms (95% CI [81.8 ms, 132.7 ms]); paired Cohen’s dz was 1.85 (95% CI [1.12, 2.58]). For گو/نو-گو ٽيسٽ, 18 measurable results yielded a mean of 91.4 % (SD 3.6 percentage points; 95% CI [89.8 %, 93.1 %]) for the measure “Accuracy”. For the within-participant contrast (No-go: incorrect taps minus Go: missed taps; 18 pairs), the mean difference was 8 percentage points (95% CI [2.4 percentage points, 13.6 percentage points]); paired Cohen’s dz was 0.66 (95% CI [0.15, 1.17]). All estimates are descriptive. Confidence intervals use normal approximations; no p-values or significance tests were calculated. Public-player comparisons, where shown, are contextual and are not population norms.
Intervals are descriptive normal approximations (±1.96 standard errors), including paired Cohen’s dz. They may be imprecise in small samples. No p-values or significance tests are used.