Jump go di content

Personality

How common aphantasia dey?

One study wey join 1,004 people find say 3.9% dey for low-imagery range, and 0.8% report say dem no fit make voluntary visual image at all. Dem use stated VVIQ questionnaire cutoffs for these estimates, and join student and online samples; these no be universal diagnosis rates or normal figures for Helibrain players. Dance et al., 2022

Test yourself
Different ivory and blue shapes wey one thin blue loop join together.

Na the Helibrain team write amLast time dem check am

Main evidence and numbers

How study classify amEstimateScoring rule wey dem use
Low-imagery range3.9%VVIQ total 16–32
Complete absence wey person report0.8%VVIQ total 16
Dim or unclear imagery inside low range3.1%VVIQ total 17–32

The paper join two samples of 502 participants. E identify 39 people for the wider low-imagery range, and eight of dem get the lowest total. This difference matter because broad definition of low imagery give different prevalence from when dem require say imagery no dey at all. For the questionnaire scoring here, lower totals mean weaker imagery. Dance et al., 2022

Wetin the questionnaire dey measure?

The Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire dey ask about how person experience pictures for mind. Na Marks original work introduce the measure; later aphantasia studies use am with clear scoring rules. If dem reverse the way dem score answers, the meaning of the total go change, so no copy cutoff without checking the version. MARKS, 1973 Dance et al., 2022

Wetin person report fit tell us about their experience, but e no be the same as task wey test how their senses perform or direct measurement of the brain. Keogh and Pearson use binocular-rivalry method to study sensory imagery, to show how researchers fit ask related question with another method. One measure no automatically fit stand in for another. Keogh et al., 2018

Aphantasia mean say person no get imagination?

No broad conclusion like that follow from this. The research dey concern particular imagery experiences, especially voluntary visual imagery. Reports from Zeman and colleagues, and the wider review of imagery, distinguish extremes of vividness from all kinds of thinking, creativity or knowledge. Person fit understand and reason about a scene without reporting a clear picture inside their mind. Zeman et al., 2015 Zeman et al., 2020 Pearson, 2019

Wetin dey affect am?

How about memory and dreams?

Dawes and colleagues describe how people wey identify with aphantasia report imagery, memory and dreaming. These na patterns for groups, and people differ plenty; e no mean say everybody get the same dream experience or memory difficulty. The way dem measure and recruit people still matter for how to understand the findings. Dawes et al., 2020

Bainbridge and colleagues' drawing study find difference between performance for object memory and spatial memory. E no support saying people wey no get visual imagery no get visual memory or no fit represent how things relate in space. Dem need assess different parts of memory separately. Bainbridge et al., 2021

Age and sex determine how common e be?

For the pooled prevalence paper, estimates for females and males no get statistical difference under the definitions wey dem check. That no prove say dem exactly equal for every population. The samples, their ages and the cutoff wey dem choose limit how far we fit apply the findings; online community wey focus on imagery go recruit people another way. Dance et al., 2022

Wetin you fit really learn from online test?

Questionnaire fit help describe the imagery wey you report and explain the words people dey use for am. E no suppose turn low score to medical diagnosis or claim about intelligence. The categories for the prevalence study na definitions wey dem use for research, no be universal rule for every online questionnaire. Dance et al., 2022 MARKS, 1973

These sources no establish any training plan wey guarantee say person wey no report vivid imagery go start to get am. The realistic use na to understand how people differ and the limits of the measurement, instead of promising cure or improvement. Pearson, 2019 Zeman et al., 2020

The 3.9% and 0.8% figures useful because dem carry their definitions along with dem. If you remove the definitions, e go make two different questions look like say dem get one answer wey dey contradict. Dance et al., 2022

Try the free test wey connect to this one

Aphantasia test

Try the aphantasia questionnaire to explore how you describe voluntary visual imagery. Read which way the scale dey go, and treat your result as wetin you report about yourself. The published percentages no prove your diagnosis or your percentile among Helibrain users.

Test yourself

Common questions

Na 0.8% or 3.9% be the prevalence?

Both figures come from the same pooled study, but dem use different definitions: complete absence wey person report versus the wider low-imagery range. Dance et al., 2022

Aphantasia mean say person no dey dream?

No universal rule follow from this. The study of cognitive profile report say imagery and dreaming experiences differ from person to person. Dawes et al., 2020

Weak imagery mean weak spatial memory?

E no be always so. The drawing study show the difference between object and spatial memory instead of treating all memory as one ability. Bainbridge et al., 2021

Sources

Cite dis page: How common aphantasia dey?. Helibrain. 2026. https://helibrain.com/pcm/answers/how-common-is-aphantasia. CC BY 4.0.

← Check more ansa dem