Skip to content

Memory & attention

Can people really multitask?

People can combine activities, but switching between tasks that need deliberate control can carry a cost in speed or accuracy. Task-switching research does not establish a universal percentage of productivity lost whenever someone multitasks. Review

Test yourself
Rounded illustrated memory cards beside a book and blue spheres.

By the Helibrain teamLast checked

Key evidence & numbers

EvidenceContext
Switch costresearchers compare performance after a change of task with performance when the task repeats. Review
Preparation and interference matterthe cost varies with cues, preparation and overlap between the tasks. Review
No universal loss percentagea laboratory response-time difference is not itself a percentage of work output lost.

What affects it?

How the tasks are cued, how much preparation is possible and whether responses conflict affect performance. This is why a task-switching result needs its experimental context. Review

Try the related free test

Task switching test

Test yourself: task switching. Read the current rule carefully and compare switching performance with repetition performance within the task.

Test yourself

Common questions

Is walking while talking the same as switching test rules?

No. Combining familiar activities and changing an explicit response rule place different demands on a person.

Does a faster result measure my workplace productivity?

We have no validated conversion from this game result to workplace output.

Can knowing the next task help?

Preparation can influence switch costs, although it does not make every source of interference disappear. Review

Sources

← Explore more answers

Make room for focus in your day with Helibrain

The app has short tests of reaction time, working memory, self-control, reasoning and creativity. Retake them whenever you like, see your trend, and find habits that may help.

Start free in your browser
Get it on Google PlayDownload on the App Store