N-back test: method
Adaptive n-back (single, dual, triple or quad stream), after the dual n-back training protocol of Jaeggi et al. (2008)
Scorer version: nback-training-1 (contract version 1, session format version 2)
← Back to the testWhat it measures
Performance on the n-back task itself: continuous updating and matching of recent items in working memory. It is a practice tool with its own progress graphs; it is not a normed working-memory assessment.
Procedure
Streams: position (one of the 8 outer cells of a 3 x 3 grid; the centre is never used), audio (8 spoken letters, or 8 tones called Notes), colour and shape (8 values each). Modes: single (position), dual (position + audio; the default), triple (+ colour) and quad (+ shape). Each cue is shown for 500 ms; the next cue follows after the chosen interval (standard 3,000 ms). A response for a stream counts for the current cue until the next cue. Keys: A (position), L (audio), S (colour), K (shape), Space pauses; on phones, buttons below the grid. A block has N warm-up cues (no responses) plus the scored cues (standard 20). Sequences come from a seeded generator that the server replays: in each stream exactly 30% of scored cues are matches (6 per 20), each pair of streams matches together on 10% of cues (2 per 20), three- and four-stream modes include cues where all or three streams match, and non-matches never accidentally repeat the N-back item. An optional 1-back tutorial gives feedback. The default preset is adaptive (standard timing and length); a manual preset lets the player set N, interval, length and feedback. An optional daily set has 20 blocks with breaks. Unfinished blocks pause when the page is left and can resume.
Parameters
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Default mode | dual (position + audio), N = 2, adaptive |
| N range | 1 to 9 |
| Cue display | 500 ms |
| Cue interval | 3,000 ms standard; 1,500, 2,000, 2,500, 4,000 or 5,000 ms in manual mode |
| Scored cues per block | 20 standard; 40, 60 or 100 in manual mode |
| Warm-up cues | N per block, not scored |
| Matches | 30% per stream; 10% per pair of streams |
| Adaptive rule | up 1 if every stream has at most 2 errors; down 1 if any stream has 6 or more; else stay |
| Daily set (optional) | 20 blocks |
| Inputs | touch buttons, mouse, keys A / L / S / K, Space to pause |
Scoring
Per stream, over scored cues: hits, misses, false alarms, correct rejections; balanced accuracy = 50 x (hit rate + correct-rejection rate), in percent, so responding to nothing (or to everything) scores 50%. The block score is the mean balanced accuracy across the selected streams; higher is better. Errors per stream = misses + false alarms, which drive the adaptive level for the next block. Reaction times per stream are summarized (median, mean, min, max) but do not enter the score. There is no comparison with other players; graphs compare the player's own sessions with the same settings.
Valid-run rules
Only complete blocks are recorded (N + scored cues, one response flag per stream per cue, no responses during warm-up). The server regenerates the sequence from the seed and rejects a session whose logged stimuli differ from it, whose accepted answers are missing, or whose finish time lies in the future. Pauses are allowed and logged. Bot signals are stored but never change scoring or graphs. These practice sessions are kept separate from the scored n-back test and never feed its comparisons or app scores.
Differences from the classic task
The standard block follows the timing and adaptation rule of Jaeggi et al. (2008): 20 + N cues, 500 ms display, 3 s per cue, up with fewer than 3 errors in every stream, down with more than 5 in any stream. Differences: spoken letters made with computer-generated speech (or tones), optional colour and shape streams, a short tutorial, phone controls, manual settings and self-paced daily blocks. It is not a replication of a research training intervention, and it is not Kirchner's original single-stream task.
Limitations
Gains on the trained task are well documented; transfer to other abilities, including intelligence, is mixed and debated. Nothing on the page promises such transfer. Audio and display timing depend on the device and browser; the log records when the page dispatched each cue, not when the screen or speaker produced it. There are no norms, and the setting is unsupervised. No clinical or diagnostic use.
Languages and review status
Instructions in all site languages. The audio stream uses native letter or syllable sets in 28 languages (Bengali, Bulgarian, Chinese Simplified and Traditional, Czech, Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Hindi, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Kazakh, Marathi, Nepali, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Serbian, Spanish, Telugu, Ukrainian, Urdu, Albanian, Armenian), recorded with computer-generated speech; other languages use the tone option. Position, colour and shape streams are language-independent.
Review status by instruction language
Published instruction languages are listed below. Translation method: machine-assisted translation with automated script and spelling checks. Language-specific material is described above; native-speaker review is not documented here.
| Instruction language | Documented review status |
|---|---|
| English | Original English text. |
| Azərbaycan dili | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Bahasa Indonesia | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Čeština | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Deutsch | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Español | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Filipino | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Français | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Hausa | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Igbo | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Italiano | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Kiswahili | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Magyar | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Nederlands | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Oʻzbekcha | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Polski | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Português | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Shqip | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Soomaali | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Srpski | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Tiếng Việt | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Türkçe | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Türkmençe | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Yorùbá | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Ελληνικά | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Български | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Кыргызча | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Қазақ тілі | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Македонски | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Монгол | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Русский | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Тоҷикӣ | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Українська | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| ქართული | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| Հայերեն | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| עברית | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| اردو | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| العربية | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| پښتو | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| سنڌي | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| فارسی | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| کوردیی ناوەندی | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| አማርኛ | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| नेपाली | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| मराठी | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| हिन्दी | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| অসমীয়া | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| বাংলা | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| ਪੰਜਾਬੀ | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| ગુજરાતી | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| ଓଡ଼ିଆ | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| தமிழ் | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| తెలుగు | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| ಕನ್ನಡ | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| മലയാളം | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| සිංහල | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| ไทย | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| ລາວ | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| မြန်မာ | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| ខ្មែរ | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| 한국어 | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| 日本語 | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| 简体中文 | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
| 繁體中文 | Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented. |
How to cite
Helibrain (2026). N-back test, vnback-training-1. https://helibrain.com/n-back-test/methods
Changelog
· Version nback-training-1 · Initial methods publication for the current released task.
References
Kirchner, W. K. (1958). Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55(4), 352-358.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043688original n-back paradigm
Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J., & Perrig, W. J. (2008). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(19), 6829-6833.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801268105dual n-back training protocol (timing, block structure, adaptation rule)
Owen, A. M., McMillan, K. M., Laird, A. R., & Bullmore, E. (2005). N-back working memory paradigm: A meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 25(1), 46-59.
https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20131review of the n-back paradigm
Soveri, A., Antfolk, J., Karlsson, L., Salo, B., & Laine, M. (2017). Working memory training revisited: A multi-level meta-analysis of n-back training studies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(4), 1077-1096.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1217-0meta-analysis: training effects are mostly task-specific
Melby-Lervåg, M., Redick, T. S., & Hulme, C. (2016). Working memory training does not improve performance on measures of intelligence or other measures of "far transfer": Evidence from a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(4), 512-534.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616635612meta-analysis: no reliable far transfer
Methods text: CC BY 4.0. Attribute Helibrain and link to this method. Source datasets and task material keep their own licences; this licence covers the methods text.
← Back to N-back test