Skip to content

Creativity test: method

Divergent Association Task (DAT)

Scorer version: 1

← Back to the test

What it measures

Verbal divergent thinking: generating words whose meanings are far apart (semantic distance), one indicator of creative potential.

Procedure

The visitor types up to 10 single-word common nouns, one at a time, without a time limit, and is asked to make them as different from each other as possible. Each word is checked on entry against the page language's word lists; a word that won't count (not a single word of letters, a number, a proper name, not a known noun, or a repeat) is marked with the reason and takes no slot, so it can be replaced. Words are 2–18 letters. English uses noun, name and number lists derived from WordNet 3.0 (simple plurals accepted); the other languages use noun, name and number lists built from Wiktionary, with inflected forms included.

Parameters

ParameterValue
Words requestedup to 10
Words scoredthe first 7 valid words
Minimum for a score2 valid words
Word length2–18 letters
Time limitnone
Inputskeyboard (physical or on-screen)

Scoring

Each scored word is turned into a meaning vector from one fixed, multilingual word-embedding space (the version is pinned so scores stay comparable). Score = mean cosine distance over all pairs of scored words × 100 (21 pairs for 7 words); higher means more distant meanings. With fewer than 7 valid words, all valid words are scored (at least 2). Valid words after the 7th are listed but not scored. Scores are comparable only within one language and one embedding version; no comparison with other players is shown.

Valid-run rules

A submission is never rejected for its words; invalid words are skipped with a reason code. Fewer than 2 valid words gives no score.

Differences from the classic task

Same instructions and the same 'first 7 valid of 10' rule as Olson et al. (2021). Differences: meaning distances come from a different, multilingual embedding space than the original, so the published DAT averages do not apply; the word lists come from different sources; runs with 2–6 valid words are still scored; it runs in 18 languages, not only English.

Limitations

The score depends on vocabulary, spelling and language, and on the biases of the embedding space (rare or technical words may sit far from everything). Strategies such as naming objects from different categories change scores. A single run is noisy. Divergent thinking is one part of creativity, not creative achievement. Not a measure of intelligence.

Languages and review status

Word lists for English and 17 further languages: Arabic, Bengali, Chinese, French, German, Hindi, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Serbian, Spanish, Turkish and Ukrainian. The test page is offered only in these languages. Instructions are in all site languages.

Review status by instruction language

Published instruction languages are listed below. Translation method: machine-assisted translation with automated script and spelling checks. Language-specific material is described above; native-speaker review is not documented here.

Instruction languageDocumented review status
EnglishOriginal English text.
Bahasa IndonesiaAutomated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented.
DeutschAutomated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented.
EspañolAutomated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented.
FrançaisAutomated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented.
ItalianoAutomated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented.
PolskiAutomated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented.
PortuguêsAutomated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented.
SrpskiAutomated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented.
TürkçeAutomated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented.
РусскийAutomated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented.
УкраїнськаAutomated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented.
العربيةAutomated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented.
हिन्दीAutomated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented.
বাংলাAutomated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented.
한국어Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented.
日本語Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented.
简体中文Automated script and spelling checks; native-speaker review not documented.

Data sources

English noun checking uses WordNet 3.0 (Princeton University, copyright 2006), under the WordNet licence: https://wordnet.princeton.edu/license-and-commercial-use . Local noun sources include Wiktionary contributors via kaikki.org, under CC BY-SA 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ . Filtering and morphology rules are specific to Helibrain. These are data sources; the word lists and item sets are not published here.

How to cite

Helibrain (2026). Creativity test, v1. https://helibrain.com/creativity-test/methods

Changelog

· Version 1 · Initial methods publication for the current released task.

References

  1. Olson, J. A., Nahas, J., Chmoulevitch, D., Cropper, S. J., & Webb, M. E. (2021). Naming unrelated words predicts creativity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(25), e2022340118.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022340118

    original paradigm and validation

  2. Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75.

    https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652929

    review of divergent thinking

  3. Beaty, R. E., & Kenett, Y. N. (2023). Associative thinking at the core of creativity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 27(7), 671–683.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2023.04.004

    semantic distance and creativity

Methods text: CC BY 4.0. Attribute Helibrain and link to this method. Source datasets and task material keep their own licences; this licence covers the methods text.

← Back to Creativity test